Letter parts of the case of the mark Qazlji (d. 1296 e) study and investigation

Abstract

(the parts of the reasonable case) is the logical researches that were controversial among the logical scholars , the ideas of the ancients and the late ones differed in a number of their questions, such as their differences in the ratio (baina baina) _which means between between_, is it part of the case? Or is it a condition upon which the utter discourse rate depends?  And their differences in the utter discourse rate, does it has two perceptions: one is a depiction, the other is ratification, or it is merely a cognitive perception?  As well as their differences in the fact of ratification, is it simple? It is a judgment alone, or a composite of acquiescence and three scenarios - the sentenced, the sentenced by and the discourse rate -, and they also differed in the fact that (acquiescence) is a science or an act of choice.