Conference Papers

Constitutionalism Versus Traditional Authority: The Role of the Constitution in the Institutionalization of Authority in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq

  • بڵاو کرایەوە 2026-04-26
  • ژمارە بەرگ 9 ژمارە 3 (2026): Special Issue (KRS Conference )
  • DOI ناسێنەری سەرچاوە دیجیتاڵییەکان https://doi.org/10.31918/twejer.2693KRS.01
  • Hassan Mustafa Hussein Soran University, Faculty of Law, Political Science and Management, Department of Law Author

DOI ناسێنەری سەرچاوە دیجیتاڵییەکان:

https://doi.org/10.31918/twejer.2693KRS.01

کلیلە وشەکان:

Constitutionalism, Traditional Authority, Family Rule, Partocracy, Kurdistan Region Constitution, Institutionalization of Authority.

پوختە

One of the fundamental questions in the political philosophy of the constitution is why states require a written constitution or legal-rational authority. A common answer is that a written constitution serves to restrain the emergence of a Leviathan, to establish rational and institutional authority, and to safeguard fundamental rights and freedoms. From this perspective, Constitutionalism is conceived as a framework for limiting political power and institutionalizing Authority, rather than allowing the persistence of traditional or despotic forms of rule. One of the primary mechanisms for achieving the institutionalization of authority is the existence of a modern constitution, functioning as the highest and most legitimate source of legal and political order.

داگرتنەکان

هێشتا داتای داگرتن بەردەست نییە.

چۆنییەتی بەکارهێنانی سەرچاوە

Hussein , Hassan Mustafa, trans. 2026. “Constitutionalism Versus Traditional Authority: The Role of the Constitution in the Institutionalization of Authority in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq”. گۆڤاری توێژەر 9 (3): 1-23. https://doi.org/10.31918/twejer.2693KRS.01.

توێژینەوە هاوشێوەکان

1-10 of 16

تۆ دەتوانیت گەڕانی پێشکەوتو کارا بکە بۆ دۆزینەوەی توێژینەوە هاوشێوەکان بەکار بهێنیت بۆ ئەم توێژیینەوەیە.